THE EFFECT OF FRAUD PENTAGON ON FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: A META ANALYSIS

Kezia Natalie Hernadi, Carmel Meiden

Abstract


This study aims to integrate research results from several journals to ascertain the impact of financial statement fraud (FFS) on fraud pentagon. FFS is an intentional effort by the company to mislead users of financial statements. Fraud pentagon explains the five elements causing FFS. The population in this study is a journal which not included in predatory journal for 2012-2022. There are 16 samples produced through purposive sampling. Secondary data for meta analysis techniques is produced through observation techniques in Seforra and Google Scholar. The results of integration show that the pressure, opportunity, capability and arrogance have positive effect on FFS as evidenced through (á¹) calculating > r table. While the rationalization variable has a negative effect on fraud financial statements.

Full Text:

PDF

References


ACFE Indonesia. (2016). Survai Fraud Indonesia 2016. Auditor Essentials, 1–60.

AICPA. (2019). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement (pp. 193–206). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119679295.ch12

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2020). Fraud Examination 4th Edition. 21(1), 1–9. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203

Amarakamini, N. P., & Suryani, E. (2019). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Bei) Tahun 2016 Dan 2017. Jurnal Akuntansi, Vol 7(2), 125–136.

Angeline, A. (2017). Pengaruh Corporate Governance terhadap Manajemen Laba di Indonesia (Studi pada beberapa Skripsi Mahasiswa Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie …. http://eprints.kwikkiangie.ac.id/2342/%0Ahttp://eprints.kwikkiangie.ac.id/2342/3/Bab II.pdf

Aprilia, A. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i1.5259

Ashter Laura, Lady. (2007). Hukum Murphy | PDF. https://www.scribd.com/doc/215983015/Hukum-Murphy

Basmar, N. A., & Ruslan, R. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Model Beneish M Score dan Fraud Score dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 4(2), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v4i2.1439

Beneish, M. D. (1999). The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296

Beneish, M. D., Charles M.C. Lee, & Nichols, D. C. (2013). Earnings Manipulation and Expected Returns.

Benford, F. (1938). The Law of Anomalous Numbers Author ( s ): Frank Benford THE LAW OF ANOMALOUS NUMBERS has been observed that the pages of a much used table of common logarithms show evidences of a selective use of the natural numbers . The pages containing the logarithms. Procedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78(4), 551–572.

Bologna, J. (1993). Handbook on corporate fraud : prevention detection and investigation. Butterworth-Heinemann. Handbook on Corporate Fraud : Prevention Detection and Investigation. Butterworth-Heinemann. https://archive.org/details/accountantshandb0000bolo/page/n5/mode/2up

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s Money: A study of the social psychology of embezzlement. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL5416032M/Other_people%27s_money

Ghandur, D. I., Sari, R. N., & Anggraini, L. (2019). Fraud pentagon. 8(1), 26–40.

GLASS, G. V. (1974). Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research 1. 3–8.

Horwath, C. (2011). The Mind Behind the Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements. United States of America: Crowe Horwath LLP, 1–62. https://www.fraudconference.com/uploadedFiles/Fraud_Conference

Indriani, N., & Rohman, A. (2022). Fraud Triangle dan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Model Beneish M-Score. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 20(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v20i1.4367

Jaunanda, M., & Silaban, D. P. (2020). Pengujian Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Resiko Financial Fraudulent Reporting. Ultima Management : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 12(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.31937/manajemen.v12i2.1581

Makowski, D., Piraux, F., & Brun, F. (2019). From Experimental Network to Meta-analysis Methods and Applications with R for Agronomic and Environmental Sciences. In France: Springer Nature B.V.

Mumpuni, P. N. D., & Jatiningsih, D. E. S. (2020). Deteksi Kecurangan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara: Pendekatan Fraud Pentagon Theory. Business and Economics Conference in Utilizatiion of Modern Technology, 82–103. https://etd.umy.ac.id/id/eprint/242/1/Halaman Judul.pdf

Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the Frequency of Use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers. Monthly Weather Review, 86(4), 117–122.

Rifaldi, A., & Indrabudiman, A. (2022). Fraud Pentagon. 7(11).

Rukmana, H. S. (2018). Pentagon Fraud Effect on Financial Statement Fraud and Firm Value. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 16(5), 118–122.

Sanulika, A., & Hidayati, W. N. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Fraud Pentagon dengan Beneish Ratio dalam Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Reporting dengan Opini Audit sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.32493/jiaup.v9i1.4399

Sarwono, J. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif & kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Widyaningsih, A., Himmawan, A., & Nugroho, D. (2022). Mendeteksi Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Model Beneish M-score pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 5(2), 2022–2384. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v5i2.2218

William R Scott. (2019). Agency Theory (William R Scott) Dalam. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The FWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. (2004) ‘The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant’, The CPA Journal, 74(12), pp. 38–42. doi: DOI:raud Diamond : Considering the Four ElemWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

Yuli Yanti Silaban, B., & Suryani Zainal, E. (2021). 1540-Article Text-4533-publish.pdf - Google Drive. 2021. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kVZaVLYtdO-zwsCXu9lZyKFMbzZcHVAy/view

Yuvin, V., & Sormin, P. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud Beneish Model. Jurnal Kontemporer Akuntansi, 2(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.24912/jka.v2i1.18124

Zahra Anggreini, S., & Himmawan D. N, A. (2022). Pentagon theory dan model beneish M-score. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(2), 965–973. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v5i2.2342




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v6i1.2264

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Kezia Natalie Hernadi, Carmel Meiden

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

Published by:

AIBPM Publisher

Editorial Office:

JL. Kahuripan No. 9 Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia
Phone:+62 341 366222
Email: journal.jicp@gmail.com
Website:http://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/JICP

Supported by: Association of International Business & Professional Management

If you are interested to get the journal subscription you can contact us at admin@aibpm.org.

ISSN 2622-0989 (Print)
ISSN 2621-993X (Online)

DOI:Prefix 10.32535 by CrossREF

Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP) INDEXED:

 

In Process


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.