Implementation of AHP and SAW Methods for Optimization of Decision Recommendations

Deborah Kurniawati, Febri Nova Lenti, Rudi Wahyu Nugroho

Abstract


Differences in interest in decision making are one of the things that must be facilitated in decision support applications. The most basic difference of interest in decision making is the difference in the weight of the importance of each criterion used. Each decision maker has their own interest in the criteria used. If these differences can be facilitated properly, the resulting decision recommendations can be optimal, in this case more in line with the interests of the users. The model is designed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weight (SAW) methods, using 5 criteria. The final result of the AHP method is in the form of criteria weights that are in accordance with the interests of decision makers and in accordance with the consistency of the comparisons that have been given. The resulting weight will be used in the final calculation of SAW, namely in the calculation of alternative weights. By using AHP, the weight of the criteria becomes more subjective according to the interests of decision makers. Thus, the resulting alternative recommendations become more optimal because they are in accordance with the needs of decision makers.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrahamsen-Mills, L., Wareing, A., Fowler, L., Jarvis, R., Norris, S., & Banford. (2021). Development of a multi criteria decision analysis framework for the assessment of integrated waste management options for irradiated graphite. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 53(4), 1224-1235.

Adianto T. R., Arifin Z., & Khairina, D. M. (2017). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan rumah tinggal di perumahan menggunakan metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi kasus: Kota Samarinda). Proceedings of Seminar Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi, Vol. 2, No. 1.

Aoun J., Quaglietta, E., Goverde, R. M. P., Scheidt, M., Blumenfeld, M., Jack, A., & Redfern, B. (2021). A hybrid Delphi-AHP multi-criteria analysis of moving block and virtual coupling railway signalling. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 129, 1-22.

Banach, J. L., Zwietering, M. H., & van der Fels-Klerx, H. J. (2021). Multi-criteria decision analysis to evaluate control strategies for preventing cross-contamination during fresh-cut lettuce washing. Food Control, 128, 108-136

Benmoussa, K., Laaziri, M., Khoulji, S., Kerkeb, M. L., & Yamami, A. E. (2019). AHP-based ApZproach foe Evaluating Ergonomic Criteria. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 856-863.

Castanon-Jano, L., Castro-Fresno, D., Blanco-Fernandez, E., & Carpio-Garcia, J. (2021). Selection of membranes and linking method in slope stabilization systems or the reduction on the installation time using multi-criteria decision analysis. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 1-14.

De Nardo, P., Gentilotti, E., Mazzaferri, F., Cremonini, E., Hansen, P., Goossens, H., & Tacconelli, E. (2020). Multi-Criteria decision analysis to prioritize hospital admission of patients affected by COVID-19 in low-resource settings with hospital-bed shortage. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 98, 494-500.

Eshra N. M., Ahmed, F. Z., Shady H. E., & Aleem, A. (2021). Assessment of mini and micro hydropower potential in Egypt: Multi-criteria analysis. Energy Reports, 7, 81-94.

Fentanu, T. M., Bagyaraj, M., Melesse M.A., & Korme, T. (2021). Seismic hazard sensitivity assessment in the Ethiopian Rift, using an integrated approach of AHP and DInSAR methods. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences,

Jinyue Chen, Shuisen Chen, Rao Fu, Chongyang Wang, Dan Li, Hao Jiang, Jing Zhao, Li Wang, Yongshi Peng, Yan Me, 2021, Simulation of water hyacinth growth area based on multi-source geographic information data: An integrated method of WOE and AHP. Ecological Indicator, 125, 1-17.

Kabo-bah, K. J., Guoan, T., Yang, X., Na, J., & Xiong, L. (2021). Erosion potential mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fractal dimension. Heliyon, 7(6) , 1-7.

Karimi, M., der Zwaan, L., Islam, K., Genabeek, J., & Rutten-vanMölken, M. (2021). Evaluating complex health and social care program using multi-criteria decision analysis: A case study of “Better Together in Amsterdam Northâ€. Health Policy Analysis, 24(7), 966-975.

Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A., & Wardoyo, R., (2006). Fuzzy Multy Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM). Graha Ilmu

Machmud, R., Saerang, D. P. E., Soegoto A. S., & Wenas R. S. (2018). E-Marketing and information system through university image on student decision selecting Teacher Training Institute (LPTK) in Eastern Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education, 1(1), 20-29.

Matori, A. N., Dano, U. L., Yusof, K. W., & Hashin, A. M. (2014). Spatial analytic hierarchy process model for flood forecasting: An integrated approach. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 20, No. 1.

Mgunda, M. I. (2019). The impacts information technology on business. Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP), 2(3), 149-156.

Mukaromah, A. L., Kusuma, I. G. N. A. E. T., & Anggraini, N. P. N. (2019). The effect of green marketing, brand awareness and price perception on purchase decision. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 4(3), 75-83.

Nsafon, B. E. K. N., Butu, H. M., Owolabi, A. B., Roh, J. W., Suh, D., & Huh, J. S. (2020). Integrating multi-criteria analysis with PDCA cycle for sustainable energy planning in Africa: Application to hybrid mini-grid system in Cameroon. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 37, 1-12.

Pérez-Hoyos, A., & Rembold, A. U. F. (2020). Integrating multiple land cover maps through a multi-criteria analysis to improve agricultural monitoring in Africa, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Volume 88, 1-15.

Rymaszewskia, S., Watróbskia, J., & Karczmarczyk, A. (2020). Identification of reference multi criteria domain model - Productionline optimization case study. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 3794–3801.

Saaty, T. L. (1991). Pengambilan keputusan bagi para pemimpin. PT. Dharma Aksara Perkasa.

Setyani, R. E., & Saputra, R. (2016). Flood-prone areas mapping at Semarang City by using simple additive weighting method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 378-386.

Tumiwa R. A. F., Apituley J. R. M., & Lasut, S. A. (2020). Is the value of the company affected by company investment decisions and financing decisions?. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 3(2), 100-110.

Turban, E., Aronson, E. J., & Liang, T. P. (2005). Decision support system and intelligence system (D. Prabantini (Trans) (7th ed.). Andi.

Wolnowska, A. E., & Konicki, W. (2018). Multi-criterial analysis of aversize cargo transport through the city using the AHP method. Transportation Research Procedia, 39, 614-623.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v4i1.1152

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Deborah Kurniawati, Febri Nova Lenti, Rudi Wahyu Nugroho

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

Published by:

AIBPM Publisher

Editorial Office:

JL. Kahuripan No. 9 Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia
Phone:
+62 341 366222
Email: journal.jicp@gmail.com
Website:http://ejournal.aibpmjournals.com/index.php/JICP

Supported by: Association of International Business & Professional Management

If you are interested to get the journal subscription you can contact us at admin@aibpm.org.

ISSN 2622-0989 (Print)
ISSN 2621-993X (Online)

DOI:Prefix 10.32535 by CrossREF

Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP) INDEXED:

 

In Process


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.