Tax Payment Revenue Ratio as Tax Risk Analysis for Manufacture Industry in Indonesia after Tax Amnesty Policy

Muhammad Rifky Santoso; Erlina Erlina

doi:10.32535/ijabim.v5i2.855

Tax Payment Revenue Ratio as Tax Risk Analysis for Manufacture Industry in Indonesia after Tax Amnesty Policy

Muhammad Rifky Santoso, Erlina Erlina

Abstract

Indonesiaâ€™s Tax Amnesty potentially will increase state tax revenues in rupiah; however, it cannot increase tax compliance as measured by the tax ratio value. Tax audit as a law enforcement needs to be carried out on taxpayers with high risk in utilizing tax amnesty policies for tax avoidance. By comparing the ratio of tax payment revenue (TPR) in manufacturing companies listed on IDX, this study finds that most of the samples are indicated to have a high risk of tax avoidance, since the value of TPR is significantly lower when the tax amnesty is enacted, compared to that prior to the enactment. To determine which taxpayers are doing illegal tax avoidance and need to be audited, further analysis is necessary for those with significant TPR reduction, one of which is by analyzing the financial ratios. This method is possibly used for each industry due to its different characteristics. It facilitates both the tax authority to increase taxpayer compliance and the taxpayer to make tax planning.

Keywords

Fiscal Risk, Net Income Margin, Tax Amnesty, Tax Avoidance, Tax Payment Ratio (TPR)

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alm, J., & Beck, W. (1993). Tax Amnesties and compliance in the long run: A time series analysis. National Tax Journal, 46(1), 53â€“60. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41788996?seq=1#fndtn-page_scan_tab_contents

Armstrong, C. S., Blouin, J. L., & Larcker, D. F. (2012). The incentives for tax planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1â€“2), 391â€“411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.04.001

Ashraff, M., Mui, D., Kee, H., & Subramaniam, R. A. P. (2020). Key success factors of organizational success : A study of MULA Car International. International Journal of Accounting & Finance in Asia Pasific, 3(2), 46â€“56.

Astiti, N. P. Y., Warmana, G. O., & Hidayah, M. (2019). Financial literation and investment decision behavior of entrepreneurs in Bali. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 4(3), 64â€“68. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v4i3.683

Badertscher, B. A., Katz, S. P., & Rego, S. O. (2013). The separation of ownership and control and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2â€“3), 228â€“250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.08.005

Bayer, R., Oberhofer, H., & Winner, H. (2015). The occurrence of tax amnesties : Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 125, 70â€“82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.006

Blaylock, B., Shevlin, T., & Wilson, R. J. (2012). Tax avoidance, large positive temporary book-tax differences, and earnings persistence. Accounting Review, 87(1), 91â€“120. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10158

Chen, X., Hu, N., & Wang, X. (2014). Tax avoidance and firm value : Evidence from China. Nankai Business Review International, 5(1), 25â€“42. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-10-2013-0037

Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386â€“405.

European Commission. (2006). Risk Management Guide For Tax Administrations (Vol. 1.02).

Francis, B. B., Ren, N., & Wu, Q. (2017). Banking deregulation and corporate tax avoidance. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(2), 87â€“104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2016.09.004

Huang, H. H., Lobo, G. J., Wang, C., & Xie, H. (2016). Customer concentration and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 72, 184â€“200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.07.018

Khan, M., Srinivasan, S., & Tan, L. (2017). Institutional ownership and corporate tax avoidance: New evidence. The Accounting Review, 92(2), 101â€“122. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51529

Kraaijenbrink, J., & Spender, J. C. (2014). Theories of the firm and their value creation assumptions social system perspective on entrepreneurship view project. In the SMS 31st Annual International Conference, Miami, US (pp. 1â€“7). Miami. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236624318

Kwiatek, P. (2018). The impact of continuous training on maximizing efficiency in tax administration: The case of a State Internal Revenue Service (SIRS) in the North Central Region of Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Business & International Management, 3(2), 39â€“56.

Malik, A. S., & Schwab, R. M. (1991). The economics of tax amnesties. Journal of Public Economics, 46(1991), 29â€“49.

Muniandy, A. M., Kee, D. M. H., Izwan, S., Imran, M., Al-Amin, A. A., Kumar, S., & Singh, S. (2020). The key success factor: A study of Honda Motor. Journal of The Community Development in Asia, 3(2), 67â€“77. https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v3i2.812

Phillips, J. D. (2003). Corporate tax-planning effectiveness: The role of compensation-based incentives. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 847â€“874. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3203228 .

Ruiz, E. H., Restrepo, C. A. P., Lopez, C. A., Jegathesan, K. A. P., Kee, D. M. H., Ganasan, K. A., â€¦ Rao, P. A. N. (2020). Samsung : Customer loyalty strategy in Malaysia and Colombia. International Journal of Accounting & Finance in Asia Pasific, 3(2), 57â€“67.

Stella, P. (1991). An economic analysis of tax amnesties. Journal of Public Economics, 46, 383â€“400.

Todeva, E. (2007). Behavioural theory of the firm. Economic Foundations of Strategic Management, (August 2007), 209â€“221. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315257068-17

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v5i2.855