Improving Government's Performance Management by Using the Balanced Scorecard on Stakeholders Perspectives

Suyuti Marzuki, Bambang Shergi Laksmono, Athor Subroto

Abstract


On the occasion of the Government Bureaucracy Reform implementation, especially the 7th program, Performance Accountability Strengthening, ministries and institutions (K/L) of the government continue to work to build a better performance management system. Recently, in the democratization and globalization era, the measurement of organization performance is an urgent task for a good government. Thus, a modern performance management is needed to provide transparency on performance accountability through a government performance management system mandated in the governance reform. Performance management is the process of developing shared understanding of (1) what will be achieved, (2) how to achieve the performance, and (3) what approach to improve performance achievement. Performance Accountability of Government Institution System (SAKIP) is a reform model to realize the good governance from the issuance of the MPR Decree XI/1998 and Law No. 28/1999 concerning clean and free of corruption state through the principles of good state administration (Law No. 28/1999), one of which is accountability. The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) with four perspectives is a highly effective method of measuring and managing performance to enhance accountability (the seventh principle) through the integration of government planning and budgeting systems, at the central, provincial and municipal levels. In addition, BSC is integrated between internal levels of government organizations from the vision of the government organization's mission as well as Strategic Objectives (SS) and the Key Performance Indicators (IKU). Furthermore, BSC with the cascade and alignment methods can be used as a tool to improve the organizational structure and functions. This study focuses on the measurement of accountability and improving the performance of government organizations in achieving the social impacts of development outcomes. The statistical test results of the significance outcomes of the MMAF (Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries) based on the maximum standard of the accountability value as defined by the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform, is an average of above 0.5 (95%), while the achievement of organizational performance with the BSC stakeholders perspective is 132.51% (2015), 118.3% (2016), and 99.05% (2017).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arja Sadjiarto. (2000). Akuntabilitas dan pengukuran kinerja pemerintahan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2(2), 138-150. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.2.2.pp. 138-150

Arofah, N., Sholig, & Nisafani, A. S. (2012). Penyusunan IT Balanced Scorecard untuk pengukuran kinerja Divisi IT di PT. Pertamina UPMS V Surabaya. Jurnal Teknik POMITS, 1(2).

Chossudovsky, M. (2003). The globalization of poverty and the new world order, 376. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/The-Globalization-Poverty-World-Order/dp/0973714700/ref=pd_sim_b_2?ie=UTF8&refRID=0GTEMC31C7ARQV8GDEBR

Ciptani, M. K. (2004). Balanced Scorecard sebagai pengukuran kinerja masa depan: suatu pengantar. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 2, 21–35. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.2.1.pp. 21-35

Ife, J. (2006). Human rights and community work: Complementary theories and practices. International Social Work, 49(3), 297–308. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872806063403

Kong, D. (2005). Performance-based budgeting: The U.S. experience. Public Organization Review, 5(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-005-1782-6

Narayan, D., & Cassidy, M. F. (2001). A Dimensional Approach to Measuring Social Capital: Development and Validation of a Social Capital Inventory. Current Sociology, 49(2), 59–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392101049002006

Niven, P. R. (2008). Balanced Scorecard step by step for government and nonprofit agencies. Environmental Science & Technology (Vol. 29). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1021/es00008a700

Partridge, M. J., & Hott, N. C. (1970). Fiscal management: Public sector governance and accountability series. Physical Therapy (Vol. 50). World Bank. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2389-7_6

Rangkuti, F. (2011). SWOT Balanced Scorecard. PT Gramedia Pusaka Utama.

Santoso, U. (2008). Pengaruh penerapan akuntansi sektor publik terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah dalam mencegah fraud. Administrasi Bisnis, 4(1), 14–33

Setiyowati, S. (2013). Analisa evaluasi kinerja pegawai untuk promosi jabatan menggunakan Model Hybrid GAP Analysis-AHP. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI), 22–30. Retrieved from http://journal.uii.ac.id/index.php/Snati/article/view/3016

Silalahi, U. (2015). Metode penelitian sosial kuantitatif. (N. F. Atif, Ed.). Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Wholey, J. S. (1996). Formative and summative evaluation: Related issues in performance measurement. Evalutation Practice, 17(2), 145–149. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409601700206

Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v3i3.888

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Suyuti Marzuki, Bambang Shergi Laksmono, Athor Subroto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of The Community Development in Asia (JCDA)

ISSN 2685-8819 (Print) | ISSN 2654-7279 (Online)

DOI Prefix: 10.32535 by CrossRef

Published by AIBPM Publisher

JL. Kahuripan No. 9, Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia

Email: journal.jcda@gmail.com

Phone: +62 341 366222

Website: https://aibpmpublisher.com/

Governed by

Association of International Business and Professional Management

Email: admin@aibpm.org

Website: https://www.aibpm.org/

Visitor Statistics

Flag Counter

Web Analytics

View JCDA Stats

Follow Us: