The Effect of Financial Performance and Environmental Sensitivity on ESG Disclosure: Empirical Study in Agroindustrial Sector

Markus Apriono, Isti Fadah, Siti Maria Wardayati, Regina Niken, Bayu Aprillianto, Nining Ika Wahyuni, Intan Awwaliyah

Abstract


Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) has become an essential issue in business operation as a result from pressures from stakeholder such as government, society, creditors, and investors not to only seeking profit, but also preserving the environment, caring the society, and having good governance. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of financial performance and environmental sensitivity on ESG implementation by using regression model. The financial performance measured by Return on Asset (ROA), environmental sensitivity measured by dummy variable which divided companies into two groups with high and low Green House Gas (GHG), and ESG disclosure measured by ESG indicators. There were 18 agroindustrial companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2019-2021 observed. The result of this study showed that there was no significant effect of financial performance measured by Return on Asset (ROA) on ESG, otherwise there was positive significant influence of environmental sensitivity on ESG.


Keywords


Agroindustrial Sector; Environmental Sensitivity; ESG Disclosure; Financial Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alsayegh, Maha F., Rashidah Abdul Rahman, and Saeid Homayoun. (2020). Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure. Sustainability 12: 3190.

Bernardi, Cristiana, and Andrew W. Stark. (2016). Environmental. Social and Governance Disclosure, Integrated Reporting, and the Accuracy of Analyst Forecasts. The British Accounting Review (2016).

Brigham, E. F., dan J. F. Houston. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Terjemahan Ali Akbar Yulianto. Edisi Kesebelas. Cetakan Ketujuh, Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122-136.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226.

Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting For the Triple Bottom Line. Measuring Business Excellence. Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025539.

Faisal, Faisal, Andri Prastiwi, and Etna Nur Afri Yuyetta. (2018). “Board Characteristics, Environmental Social Governance Disclosure and Corporate Performance: Evidence From Indonesia Public Listed Companies.†In The 2018 Fifth International Conference on Governance and Accountability.

Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S. & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework. J Bus Ethics 122, 53–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1748-5.

Garcia, Alexandre S., Wesley Mendes-Da-Silva, and Renato J. Orsato. (2017). Corporate Sustainability, Capital Markets, and ESG Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 150, pp. 135-147.

Gamerschalag, Rasmin, Klaus Moller, and Frank Verbeeten. (2011). Determinants of Voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Germany. Published article with open access at springerlink.com.

Hahn, Rudiger, and Michael Kuhnen. (2013). Determinants of Sustainability Reporting: A Review of Results, Trends, Theory and Opportunities in an Expanding Field of Research. Journal of Cleaner Production 59: 5–21. [CrossRef].

Kolk, A. and R Van Tulder. (2010). International Businesss Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. International Business Review, 19 (2), 119-125.

Lagasio, Valentina, dan Nicola Cucari. (2019). Corporate Governance and Environmental Social Governance Disclosure: A Meta-Analytical Review. 2019:1-11.

Menassa, Elie, and Nancy Dagher. (2020). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility disclosures of UAE National Banks: A Multi-Perspective Approach. Social Responsibility Journal. Vol. 16 No. 5 2020.

MSCI. (2022). 2022-esg-trends-to-watch/story-behind-esg-trends. https://www.msci.com/research-and-insights/2022-esg-trends-to-watch/story-behind-esg-trends.

Naeem, Nasruzzaman, Serkan Cankaya, Recep Bildik. (2022). Does ESG performance affect the financial performance of environmentally sensitive industries? A comparison between emerging and developed markets. Borsa Instanbul Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.014.

Rahman, Rashidah Abdul, and Maha Faisal Alsayegh. (2021). Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. Vol. 14.

Suharyani, R., Ulum, I., & Jati, A. W. (2019). Pengaruh Tekanan Stakeholder dan Corporate Governance terhadap Kualitas Sustainability Report. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 2(1), 71–92

Zuraida, Zuraida, Nurul Houqe, and Tony Van Zijl. (2016). “Value Relevance of Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure.†Journal of International Accounting Research (JIAR) 2 (4). doi:10.1111/1540-5834.00104.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v8i3.2531

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Markus Apriono, Isti Fadah, Siti Maria Wardayati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Applied Business and International Management (IJABIM)

ISSN 2614-7432 (Print) | ISSN 2621-2862 (Online)

DOI Prefix: 10.32535 by CrossRef

Published by AIBPM Publisher

JL. Kahuripan No. 9, Hotel Sahid Montana, Malang, Indonesia

Email: journal.ijabim@gmail.com

Phone: +62 341 366222

Website: https://aibpmpublisher.com/

Governed by

Association of International Business and Professional Management

Email: admin@aibpm.org

Website: https://www.aibpm.org/

Indexed by

SINTA Garuda Google Scholar Dimensions ASEAN Citation Index

Visitor Statistics

Flag Counter

Web Analytics

View IJABIM Stats

Follow Us: